The hidden assumption
Set the bias slider below and flip 100 times. Watch how observed frequency changes with bias.
The formula everyone knows
You've probably seen this before:
There are two outcomes, one heads and one tails, so the probability is one half. Except it's often wrong.
If all outcomes are equally likely, then: where is the number of outcomes in event and is the size of the sample space.
The equally likely assumption
Notice the phrase "equally likely" in the definition. It determines whether the formula gives you the right answer.
Where naive probability works
The formula works when outcomes are genuinely symmetric:
- Fair dice rolled on a flat surface
- Coins manufactured to exacting standards
- Cards shuffled by a machine
- Names drawn from a hat
In these cases, counting works. Count the ways to win, count the total, divide.
Where naive probability fails
The formula fails when symmetry doesn't hold:
- A coin worn thin on one side
- Dice with microscopic bubbles
- Weather patterns shaped by geography
- Elections influenced by countless factors
Can you tell the difference? Sort these real-world scenarios into whether the naive formula works or fails:
A player making a free throw
The counting problem
Even when the naive definition applies, you still have to count correctly.
For a coin, counting is easy. For two dice, it gets subtle. For passwords or poker hands, counting is where most of the effort goes.
Before using the naive formula, ask yourself: are these outcomes actually symmetric? Is there any reason nature would favor one over another? If you're not sure, you need different tools.
Test your understanding
What's next
The next lesson is about the rules of probability: what can we actually do with P(A)?